It's time to learn how to cite two authors in APA
Although it is always recommended to go to the main source, there are cases in which you will be forced to quote a quote (forgive the redundancy) written in another text. Whether the original writing in question is no longer available, is out of date, or is in a language you don't understand and you can't access it, the American Psychological Association (APA) has rules about how to cite an author within another author APA 6.
About side quotes
When the source you work with provides purely original content, it is considered a primary source, but if it "rehashes" or cites the work of third parties, it becomes a secondary source.
In this way, citations are also classified into primary and secondary. When they are written on a main and unpublished source of completely original documents (maps, magazines, autobiographies, newspapers, films, etc.), the citations are then considered as primary. In the event that the citation is about a secondary source, then it is called side quote.
Always look for the original source
In this case, when we want to know how to cite an author within another author APA 6, refers to the fact that we have a text where the writer quotes someone else.
If the quote is really relevant to your research, the suggestion is to find the main source, as you will have a broader context of the topic. That main source can contain more relevant information for your scientific research work and, nothing better than processing the information in your head and not through third parties.
However, the APA has rules about how to make these author quotes about another author, since it is understood that you might not have access to the main source.
Be very careful with them. You must have full confidence in your main source, investigate every detail and be fully certain that the information reproduced by this other author is true, because otherwise you would be incurring a very serious fault for your own investigation.
Be very careful with them. You must have full confidence in your main source, investigate every detail and be fully certain that the information reproduced by this other author is true, because otherwise you would be incurring a very serious fault for your own investigation.
Be very careful with them. You must have full confidence in your main source, investigate every detail and be fully certain that the information reproduced by this other author is true, because otherwise you would be incurring a very serious fault for your own investigation.
Secondary citations are also known in APA format as citation citations, and they vary depending on a few factors.
For example, if it is a direct quote from an author cited in another work, it would be done as follows:
In this regard, Grisham mentions in his research (2015, cited in Curay. 2017, p. 89) that...
As you can see, both the primary and secondary sources are named, giving credit to both.
But, in the bibliographical references, you should only name the text that you have and not the primary source. In this case:
Curay, M. (2017) History of salsa in Latin America. Music Publisher.
If it is an indirect quote, a good example is the following:
In recent research (Grisham 2015, cited in Curay. 2017, p. 89) it is stated that...
Special cases
It usually happens that you do not know some information to make the appointment of the appointment. If, for example, you don't have the year of publication of the original article, you can skip it. For example:
On the subject, Arrioja (as cited in Rodríguez, 2005).
We can also be faced with the case that an author makes a "self-citation" to avoid being plagiarized. In that case, the quote could be done like this:
(Arrioja, 2005, as cited in Arrioja, 2007).
Or you can make a slightly more explanatory and much better worded quote like:
Arrioja (2007) explained in his own 2005 research that…
What if it's one author who paraphrased another? It's a valid scenario and you, as a new researcher, could also quote this verbatim. In that case, it is suggested to start with an explanatory paragraph, in the style:
What if it's one author who paraphrased another? It's a valid scenario and you, as a new researcher, could also quote this verbatim. In that case, it is suggested to start with an explanatory paragraph, in the style:
What if it's one author who paraphrased another? It's a valid scenario and you, as a new researcher, could also quote this verbatim. In that case, it is suggested to start with an explanatory paragraph, in the style:
What if it's one author who paraphrased another? It's a valid scenario and you, as a new researcher, could also quote this verbatim. In that case, it is suggested to start with an explanatory paragraph, in the style:
What if it's one author who paraphrased another? It's a valid scenario and you, as a new researcher, could also quote this verbatim. In that case, it is suggested to start with an explanatory paragraph, in the style:
Or also that you are facing a secondary work with a quote of quotes from multiple works. In that case, the quote would be done like this:
Or also that you are facing a secondary work with a quote of quotes from multiple works. In that case, the quote would be done like this:
Or also that you are facing a secondary work with a quote of quotes from multiple works. In that case, the quote would be done like this:
Or also that you are facing a secondary work with a quote of quotes from multiple works. In that case, the quote would be done like this:
For example: Or also that you are facing a secondary work with a quote of quotes from multiple works. In that case, the quote would be done like this:.
It is also remembered that this type of appointment cannot have more than 40 words or three lines and must be enclosed in quotes. Otherwise, they must go outside the original paragraph, without quotes and with another format.
it's never too much
Although we know that you want to know how to cite an author within another author apa 6, we reiterate again that you should try to access the main source to avoid confusion or problems with your research.
Surely you are dedicating a lot of time and hours without sleep to your scientific research work and it would not be pleasant if you had to redo some chapters because you chose to make secondary citations or, worse, that your work is not taken seriously because the rest of the researchers consider that this is not a work of sufficient rigor.
Make as few side dates as you can. The best thing is that you read and process all the information yourself so that you take what really works for your research.