Here we explain how to cite when the APA source is repeated
The presentation format of scientific works of the American Psychological AssociationThe presentation format of scientific works of the
The presentation format of scientific works of the
The presentation format of scientific works of the
The presentation format of scientific works of the The presentation format of scientific works of the or that, for some reason, it has been decided or that, for some reason, it has been decidedor that, for some reason, it has been decided
or that, for some reason, it has been decided or that, for some reason, it has been decided.
or that, for some reason, it has been decided
or that, for some reason, it has been decided or that, for some reason, it has been decided.
or that, for some reason, it has been decided
Madison, H. (s.f.) Down to the rabbit hole: curious adventures and cautionary tales of a former playboy bunny. Dey Street Books.
If other information is missing
Unfortunately, not having a data is something that could happen to you with some other detail, or even, you could lack information on two or three data.
If so, this is what you should do:
If you do not have the author's name: Replace it with the name of the title.
In that case, the format of the reference would be as follows:
Title in italics. (Date) Source.
And the quote would be like this:
(Title, Date).
This should not be confused with anonymous authors, which is another category. There may be works signed by an "anonymous" author that must be cited and referenced by writing "anonymous" in the author's name.
This should not be confused with anonymous authors, which is another category. There may be works signed by an "anonymous" author that must be cited and referenced by writing "anonymous" in the author's name.
Anónimo. (2015) Down to the rabbit hole: curious adventures and cautionary tales of a former playboy bunny. Dey Street Books.
This should not be confused with anonymous authors, which is another category. There may be works signed by an "anonymous" author that must be cited and referenced by writing "anonymous" in the author's name.
This should not be confused with anonymous authors, which is another category. There may be works signed by an "anonymous" author that must be cited and referenced by writing "anonymous" in the author's name.
This should not be confused with anonymous authors, which is another category. There may be works signed by an "anonymous" author that must be cited and referenced by writing "anonymous" in the author's name.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
Although it is not very frequent, it could happen that you do not have the title of the work. If this is your case, it also has a solution. You should only provide a description of the document in square brackets instead of the title. Also write the source, outside the brackets.
It is a matter of combining the above, substituting the author for the title of the work (in italics) and writing "s.f." in the date. The source must also be disclosed.
The format of the reference is as follows:
Title in italics. (s.f.) Source.
And the quotes would be done like this:
(Titus, s.f.)
What happens if you do not have in your hands the name of the author and the title of the work? In that case, it must replace the author with the description of the work (in square brackets), followed by the date and the source. This is how the reference would be made:
[Work description]. (Date). Fountain.
And the quote would be:
([Description of the work], Date).
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
If you are missing the date of publication and the title of the work, then add the author, fill in the "year" line with an "s.f.", describe the work in brackets, and state the source.
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
That for references and citations would be done under this format:
But “s.f.” is not the only abbreviation accepted by the APA. Here we mention the rest of the abbreviations normally used in dissertations, degree projects and scientific articles written under this popular format:
- cap .: chapter.
- ed .: edition.
- ed. rev .: revised edition.
- 2nd ed .: Second edition.
- Ed. (Eds.): Editor (Editors).
- Trad(s): Translator(s).
- p. (pp.): page (pages).
- Vol.: Volumen.
- vols .: volumes
- No.: Number.
- Pt .: Part.
- Technical Info: Technical Report.
- Sup.: Supplement.
These abbreviations must be written as reproduced in this list, taking care if it is written in uppercase or lowercase, spaces or not, periods or not. Otherwise, the abbreviation would be considered "wrong".
, taking care if it is written in uppercase or lowercase, spaces or not, periods or not. Otherwise, the abbreviation would be considered "wrong".